Why Did Rome Fall?
A.D. 476
It's not entirely arbitrary that Medieval/Renaissance History at About.com begins and Ancient/Classical History ends in A.D. 476. Edward Gibbon's 476 date for the Fall of Rome is conventionally acceptable because that's when the Germanic Odoacer deposed the last Roman emperor to rule the western part of the Roman Empire. However, the people who lived through the takeover would probably be surprised by the importance we place on this event.
And there are other, reasonably momentous dates for the Fall of the Roman Empire.
When Did Rome Fall?
Some say the split into an eastern and western empire governed by separate emperors caused Rome to fall. The eastern half became the Byzantine Empire, with its capital at Constantinople (modern Istanbul). The western half remained centered in Italy. Many say the Fall of Rome was an ongoing process, lasting more than a century. Since Rome still exists, it is argued that it never fell. Some prefer to say that Rome adapted rather than fell. [For some more details, see Decline of Rome.] A related question, one subject to even more discussion is:
Why did Rome Fall?
There are adherents to single factors, but more people think a combination of such factors as Christianity, decadence, lead, monetary trouble, and military problems caused the Fall of Rome. Imperial incompetence and chance could be added to the list. Even the rise of Islam is proposed as the reason for Rome's fall, by some who think the Fall of Rome happened at Constantinople in A.D.
1453.
- Theories on the Fall of Rome
- University of Texas: "210 Reasons for the decline of the Roman Empire." Source: A. Demandt, Der Fall Roms (1984)
The first major historian to deal with the decline and Fall of Rome was the 5th century historian Zosimus, but the best-known name connected with the Fall of Rome is Edward Gibbon. Historians of ancient Rome have long been fascinated with the fall of this powerful empire. Recently there has been a spate of books explaining it:
The Decline and Fall of Rome
The Roman Empire not only expanded, but was modified by the conquered people. The structure of the Roman government changed to deal with new situations. Emperors moved the capital away from the city of Rome, not just setting up an eastern capital in Nicomedia and then Constantinople, but also moving the seat of western government from Rome to Milan. They also developed an impressive civil bureaucracy, but such changes were not enough.
- Alaric and the Fall of Rome in A.D. 410
- Articles on the End of the Roman Empire
- The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire Volume 1 Chapter, by Edward Gibbon
The Extent of the Empire at the Time of the Fall of Rome
Take a look at the maps to see the changing expanse of the Roman Empire.
Rome started out as a small, hilly settlement, by the Tiber River, in the middle of the Italian boot. It was surrounded by more powerful neighbors.
By the time Rome had become an empire, the territory covered by the term "Rome" looked completely different. It reached its greatest extent in the second century A.D. Some of the theories on the Fall of Rome focus on the geographic diversity and the territorial expanseRoman emperors and their legions had to control.
Next:
Decay, Christianity, Vandals | Economy | Lead and the SplitSign up for a free weekly Ancient/Classical History email newsletter
Source...